Gender
1 = Male
2 = Female

Years of professional experience
1 = 0-5 years
2 = 6-10 years
3 = 11-20 years
4 = 21+ years

Current role
1 = Headteacher
2 = Deputy headteacher
3 = Assistant headteacher
4 = Bursar
5 = ICT Co-ordinator
6 = ICT subject leader
7 = Head of ICT
8 = ICT Manager
9 = Other
10 = more than 1 box ticked

Current role - 1
1 = School/Office/Business manager
2 = Data manager
3 = H&S officer
4 = Director of resources
11 = KS manager/coordinator/leader
12 = Phase leader
13 = Director of Maths/ICT
14 = ICT Strategy Leader
16 = Head of Year/Year Group Leader
17 = Head of Subject/Subject coordinator (not ICT)
18 = SENCO
19 = Head of Communication
20 = Inclusion coordinator
21 = Senior teacher
22 = Lead teacher
25 = ICT teacher
26 = Subject teacher (not ICT)
27 = Teacher on leadership team
31 = Class teacher
32 = Teacher (general)
33 = Teacher (SEN)
41 = In house consultant
98 = Other relevant/vague comment
99 = Irrelevant/Uncodeable comment

Have a written strategy for ICT/e-learning
1 = Yes, embedded
2 = Yes, separate
3 = No

How often is plan reviewed
1 = At least annually
2 = About every two years
3 = About every three years
4 = Less often
5 = Not applicable

Using technology to support learning next three years - promote independent learning
1 = High priority
2 = Medium priority
3 = Low priority
4 = Not a priority for my school
5 = Not sure

How helpful has info from org been in dev strategy - DCSF
1 = Very helpful
2 = Quite helpful
3 = Not very helpful
4 = Not at all helpful
5 = Not received information from this org
6 = Never heard of them

How is ICT taught
1 = Discrete
2 = Embedded

school has written environment strategy
1 = Agree
2 = Disagree
3 = Not applicable
4 = Not sure

participated in any ICT leadership training past two years?
1 = Yes
2 = No

state which leadership training? - 1
7 = Leading a Specialist Status School in Mathematics & Computing
23 = CLEO (Cumbria & Lancashire Education Online)
61 = In-house sessions to develop staff competencies within ICT

How often used to identify ICT CPD needs - Individual ICT CPD reviews
1 = Often
2 = Sometimes
3 = Rarely
4 = Never
5 = Not sure

areas of CPD been a focus in past 12 months - General ICT skills
1 = Great extent
2 = Some extent
3 = A little
4 = Not at all
5 = Not applicable

rate importance of the following ICT CPD for improving learning and teaching - Teachers mentored by colleague
1 = Very important
2 = Quite important
3 = Not very important
4 = Not at all important
5 = Not used
6 = Not sure

percentage of overall school budget this FY spent on ICT
1 = 0%
2 = 1%
3 = 2%
4 = 3%
5 = 4%
6 = 5%
7 = 6%
8 = 7%
9 = 8%
10 = 9%
11 = 10%
12 = 11-15%
13 = 16-20%
14 = More than 20%
15 = more than 1 box ticked

percentage of ICT budget in this FY spent on - ICT equipment
1 = 0%
2 = 1-5%
3 = 6-10%
4 = 11-15%
5 = 16-20%
6 = 21-30%
7 = 31-40%
8 = 41-50%
9 = 51% or more
10 = more than 1 box ticked

how confident school will have adequate funding for - Purchasing (DLRs)
1 = Very confident
2 = Confident
3 = Not very confident
4 = Not at all confident
5 = Not sure

likely to use best value purchasing mechanisms to ensure aggregated savings - LA purchasing Framework
1 = Very likely
2 = Quite likely
3 = Not very likely
4 = Not at all likely
5 = Not planning to invest
6 = Not sure

To what extent does school use the following - electronic (MIS)
1 = Great extent
2 = Some extent
3 = A little
4 = Not at all
5 = We do not have this system

confident make best use of ICT in relation to the following - electronic (MIS)
1 = Very confident
2 = Confident
3 = Not very confident
4 = Not at all confident
5 = Don't use/do not have system
6 = Don't know

school's ability to manage non attendance affected by recording electronically?
1 = Much improved
2 = Improved
3 = Worse
4 = Much worse
5 = Not recorded electroncially
6 = Not sure

Does school have website
1 = Yes
2 = No
3 = Don't know

confident that teaching staff can access equipment - Networked desktop computers
1 = Very confident
2 = Confident
3 = Not very confident
4 = Not at all confident
5 = We do not have access to this
6 = Not sure

are learners encouraged to use the following - Online discussion groups
1 = To a great extent
2 = To some extent
3 = Not at all
4 = Learners are discouraged from using this software
5 = I have not heard of this
6 = Don't know

teachers fully informed about what learning platform could contribute - Delivering lessons
1 = Very well informed
2 = Quite well informed
3 = Not very well informed
4 = Not at all informed
5 = Not sure

Home access scheme in my school
1 = not aware of any home access scheme(s)
2 = aware of home access scheme(s) not yet implementing
3 = implementing an access scheme

extent home access will impact - ICT purchasing policy
1 = Large impact
2 = Medium impact
3 = Small impact
4 = No impact
5 = Don't know

extent home access will impact - 1
1 = Improving pupil learning through Internet research
2 = Access to VLE (and e-portfolios)
3 = Impact of ICT on curriculum/curriculum delivery
4 = Communication aids
11 = Creating a lot of extra work
12 = School available to ALL groups 24/7
13 = Huge impact on budget
91 = Not sure home access is feasible
98 = Other relevant/vague comment
99 = Irrelevant/Uncodeable comment

sources used for e-safety advice - 1
1 = DCSF - Know It All
2 = NCSL
3 = NSPCC
5 = LGFL (London)
6 = SWGFL
7 = E2BN
8 = Securus
9 = Ranger
11 = Police
12 = BBC
16 = Think U Know
17 = Surf Control
18 = Keeping Kids Safe
21 = Head teacher
22 = Junior school
23 = Other schools
24 = Governors
26 = Other authorities
27 = Overseas websites
31 = Training course
32 = Research
41 = ICT partners
42 = Managed Service Provider
51 = Wrote ourselves
97 = Unsure/Don't know
98 = Other relevant/vague comment
99 = Irrelevant/Uncodeable comment

what extent addressed for learners - Critical evaluation of information from the internet
1 = Fully addressed
2 = To a great extent
3 = To some extent
4 = Not addressed
5 = Don't know

has ICT improved ability to engage parents - assessment of their child's progress
1 = Great improvement
2 = Some improvement
3 = A little improvement
4 = No improvement
5 = Did not need improvement
6 = Not sure

are ICT facilities made available for community - Drop in access to the internet during school day
1 = More than once a week
2 = About once a week
3 = Between once and three times a month
4 = Less than once a month
5 = Never/school does not have such facilities
6 = Not sure

1 = Primary
2 = Secondary
3 = Special